As a very youthful person in the 1970s, I was delighted to discover support for “my” thesis that relations are prior to things (and much else of interest) in the French writers associated with so-called structuralism. (The Anglophone comparative literature people had not yet invented “poststructuralism”.) There have been many structuralisms and attributions thereof over the years. I tend to be sympathetic to a lot of them — mathematical, linguistic, and historiographical.
From my current perspective, the unifying theme is that structure — of whatever sort —statically captures a field of potential inferences. Such fields of potential inference are the basis on which mathematical theories, proprieties of linguistic usage, practices and practical attitudes of individuals, and large cultural formations are all constituted as determinate things. I actually use this in my day job at the mundane level of capturing potential inferences in a software or data model. (See also Structure, Potentiality; Difference; Genealogy; Archaeology of Knowledge; 1968.)